Criminal Sentencing

Abstract

        This learning team assignment we forget discuss the Goals of execrable Sentencing. We will also discuss the pros and cons of each goal from a societys point of view associated with the goal and consider whether the goals of sentencing could or should be ranked in importance.

        Different learning team members will discuss the five Goals of Criminal Sentencing. Jason Frausto will discuss revenge and incapacitation. Catherine will discuss deterrence and rehabilitation. Ann Robinson will discuss the final examination goal restoration.

        Jason discusses Retribution. The explanation of retribution is the act of

taking revenge upon a venomous perpetrator. This is known as one of the earliest forms of precept for punishing criminals. The punishment was swift and did not cost citizen whatsoever money. Punishment that was usually imposed on criminal was remainder or exile. The accused very seldom had a sense of hearing to splay there innocence. I can only recall how many falsely accused people that were put to death as a result of retribution. I do retrieve in capital punishment, but everyone deserves a hearing to prove his or her innocence or guilt. The sentencing should fit the crime.

        The just desert model is an important tool to the criminal justice system.



The definition of the just desert model is a model of criminal sentencing that hold the criminal offenders deserve the punishment they receive at the hands of the law and that punishments should be appropriate to the type and acrimony of the crime committed.

Goals of Criminal Sentencing

Certain countries still have very early and harsh punishments for petty crimes. For example if a thief is caught in the Middle East, his hand is cut off. If we went by their laws there would be a huge amount of people in the join States with no hands at...

If you want to get a intact essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.